Inclusion of teens in sex index
Deborah Coddington is seriously screwed up if she believes that publicising all convicted sex offenders will make the environment safer. A more useful publication would be one that lists all violent recidivists, sexual or not. The youths are paying for their drunken activities, but nothing suggests that they are likely to re-offend.
What advantage will reading her publication give you? Will you feel safer if none of your neighbours are in her publication? Will you be less cautious about your children's activities if none of your neighbours are listed? Will you be worried if you find out that your neighbour had sex with his girlfriend when she was fifteen and a half and he had just turned sixteen? The only advantage I can see in her publication is that it will make money for her, from the same people who watch Holmes, the people who read the tabloids for juicy scandal.
