« Quote - ConsistencyIt would be stupid... »

Mon 30-Aug-2004

Categories: Gay, Marriage

Link: http://www.stonesoup.co.nz/chinashop/archives/003720.html

Iona, at Bull in a China Shop, looks at the issue of civil unions being marriage lite and instead sees that marriage is civil union in drag. She is not aware of who first coined the phrase that the Civil Union Bill is simply the Marriage Act in drag.

My previous arguments have been that the meaning of the word marriage has changed since governments forced marriages to be legal agreements and made themselves the third party in the relationship. By automatically giving priests the legal right to be witness to a union has muddied the waters. A church blessing on a union legally should be no different to a baptism.

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

No feedback yet

Comments are closed for this post.

This is the ephemeral marks left after traversing the web and life.

This isn't me, it's bits of me... the bits I'm willing to share; nothing more, nothing less (see above for details).

XML Feeds

Chat with me

Skype status Skype
GTalk

Murmurings

    Road ID - Be known

    Threadless t-shirts

    Search

    User tools

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    powered by b2evolution free blog software